The Construction of Different Identities in the Digital World

By 2025, it seems that no one will have not used digital platforms and social media. In the digital age, the concept of identity has long transcended physical boundaries or fixed social categories. Our self-perception is now inextricably intertwined with digital technologies and online interactions. Every post, like, and profile update contributes to constructing and conveying who we are. This is done not only for others but also for ourselves.

The Construction of Digital Platforms

Digital social platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and X (Twitter) simultaneously render identity a performative process, enabling users to strategically fashion an idealized self through an instrumental array of images, text, and interactions. The recent wave of controversies and downfalls among internet celebrities only reinforces this argument. Through editing and clipping, a so-called “self” is modified and refined to cater to various aesthetic preferences. These factors also reflect what Goffman (1959) emphasized, that individuals perform different roles on different platforms and in different situations. This continual negotiation demonstrates that identity on digital platforms is not a fixed truth, but rather a process of continuous re-construction.

Image from https://mq.mbd.baidu.com/r/1LQIuUOEda0f=cp&rs=2571338363&ruk=jE_LksVN2ZZqLDTvR0w8JQ&u=9aa040139183fc70&urlext=%7B%22cuid%22%3A%22_8vPtgigSfgoiukgu2X8luEBulhuBuogu2Kf_aoHagePHuPli23i_8vWMllt1ukay8mA%22%7D and https://apnews.com/article/mrbeast-jimmy-donaldson-allegations-philanthropy-feastibles-742306d7c77e2eca8d895bf439790c69#

The Construction of the Algorithm

Simultaneously, digital identity is molded by algorithms and data systems that frequently lie outside our sphere of control. By collecting, classifying, and curating content according to user behavior, social platforms amplify specific aspects of identity and simultaneously marginalize or conceal others. Thus, identity is co-constructed, forged not solely by individual agency but also by the interplay of technological and market-driven forces. Network technology has reshaped the way we “become ourselves”. Here, we are both the subjects who construct ourselves and the objects defined by the platform algorithms (Turkle, 2011). Both the content we encounter and the perceptions formed of us are contingent upon the unseen workings of visibility metrics, popularity dynamics, and algorithmic logic.

Image from: Social media: a digital social mirror for identity development during adolescence

Personal Expression

While numerous issues remain to be considered, the digital world has also opened up new spaces for self-expression, creating new possibilities for exploration and belonging. Online spaces provide opportunities for people to connect through shared interests, experiences, and values that may not be represented in their immediate physical environments. Marginalized groups in the physical world can thus reclaim agency through sharing and connection, redefining themselves within virtual communities. Digital platforms provide opportunities for experimentation, anonymity, and transformation, enabling individuals to explore, test, and reinvent themselves. Self-expression on social media enables people to practice self-presentation and receive corresponding feedback (Hollenbaugh, 2021). The internet thus becomes a state where identity is not merely expressed, but is constantly generated and reshaped through interaction and feedback.

Conclusion

In conclusion, identity construction in the digital world is a fluid and interactive social process. It oscillates between authenticity and performance, and navigates the tension between autonomy and passivity. Our online selves reflect both who we truly are and who we aspire to become. As digital spaces continue to expand, it becomes increasingly important to understand how technology mediates and shapes identity. In algorithm-driven media environments, comprehending the digital construction of identity is key to rethinking the fundamental question: “What is the self?”

Reference

Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

Hollenbaugh, E. (2021). Self-presentation in social media: Review and research opportunities. Review of Communication Research9, 80–98. https://doi-org.uow.idm.oclc.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.027

Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.

Leave a Reply